Flat Rates In Kharghar

A Che Guevara at the White House

A world without nuclear weapons is the dream of Obama since he was 22 years and attended Columbia University in New York , a dream that goes back to Moscow and the G8 at the Eagle. Witness an article he then Sundial wrote for the university newspaper, entitled "Breaking the mentality of war." In the article, found a few months ago and tested now by New York Times, Obama proposed the elimination of all nuclear arsenals of the great powers. "Discussing the possibility of first strike or second strike nuclear suits only to military industrial interests with their billions," wrote the future president of the United States. "We must not accept this perverse logic, but making a better world" Obama said, praising the student movement that sought to freeze the U.S. and Soviet arsenals, but suggesting that it was necessary to go further, get to nuclear disarmament.

83, when Obama released "Breaking the mentality of war," was the Republican President Ronald Reagan, who had just launched the space shield project then taken up by George W. Bush a few years ago. Reagan was against a new treaty under discussion of the prohibition of nuclear tests. But Obama supported it in his article, arguing that the treaty would be "the first major step towards a world free of nuclear weapons (" nuclear free world ", a definition that became the slogan of peace). It denounced "the silent, continuous advance of militarism in America and the growing threat of war."

professor Michael Baron, who at that time held a course in foreign policy at Columbia University, recalls that Obama presented a paper "on how America and the USSR could negotiate disarmament." "Breaking the mentality of war" was discovered to the establishment of Obama in the White House by Steven Brockman, a former student who published the same number of Sundial article on Germany, and now teaches German literature at Carnegie Mellon University. According to Baron and Brockman, Obama participated in student demonstrations against Reagan, including that of a million people in Central Park in New York, with signs reading "Bread not bombs" and "Freeze or burn. In his autobiography, the president did not dwell on his commitment to anti-nuclear but the New York Times notes that since joining the Senate in 2004 Obama has fought to reduce nuclear arsenals. In Moscow, the newspaper notes, wants to negotiate the reduction of nuclear warheads from 2,200 to 1,500 per side and strengthen the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The New York Times concludes that Obama only the second in a completely nuclear-free Iran and North Korea would give up to get the bomb.

This article Ennio Caretto, Corriere della Sera yesterday, shooting a `article in the NYT, about the passions of youth Obama.In theory are, of course, but given the passions of youth conduct by Obama in recent months still seem very much alive in Obama.Un president who as a young man, while the world was threatened by communist totalitarianism, instead of supporting the policy of his country was hoping for a cancellation of the American advantage.

L `America, led by the great Ronald Reagan, could in fact compete with the USSR 'in terms of armaments and at the same time ensuring a high standard of living for its citizens, unlike the Soviet slave labor even though ( people in the gulag) starved.

A `abolition of all nuclear weapons, not surprisingly wanted by the left subsidized by Moscow, would have allowed the communist regime sopravvivere.Questo article clearly explains why the` openings Chavez, in Cuba at `Iran` s cowardice against Korea, the choices on `abortion, economic statism.

Poor America, that president who is chosen. Hopefully last only 4 years.

How To Clear Memory Access Violation In Tally 7.2

Benedict XVI el `useless proposal to cancel the debt poor countries

Benedict XVI `renewing the appeal of his predecessor John Paul II has invited through a letter to Berlusconi, the G8 countries to abolish or at least significantly reduce the debt countries poveri.Benedetto XVI, has rightly pointed out that in recent decades, although all countries have benefited in a different way of economic development that brought hundreds of millions of people to live meglio.Cio `, I might add, has been possible is when the communist world collapsed, and democracy and the capitalist system have spread to almost ovunque.Questo in many countries has led to a differentiation in the distribution of wealth because as correctly `was written by an unknown thinker` capitalism 'is an unequal distribution of wealth, communism a `` equal distribution of poverty.

At the same time, Because, as a democracy for economic development must apply a capitalist economic system based on the property market competition and free market, the same way a capitalist system that is not and can not develop fully if not inside of a democracy.

In that regard, is easy to remember how capitalism presupposes free competition between all subjects and in countries where there is a dictatorship or totalitarianism that is not you can achieve. In fact, in these countries on grounds of race, class, religious, political, entire social groups there are always a priori excluded from the competition, and others accumulate wealth in a completely arbitrary way, perhaps through the confiscation of property.

L `last year, recalls how the pontiff, however, is verified and is a crisis that threatens the achievement of` d `UN millennium goal: the abolition of the` `extreme poverty by 2015.

Ratzinger, in this regard, he recalled that the economy should not prevail over the dignity of the person and this, of course, that possso concordare.Mi has instead left speechless, the proposal to abolish the papal debt for poor countries .

I was surprised, Why is a good proposal but useless unless dannosa.I the poorest countries, are often African dictatorships in which the elite of the tribe or ethnic group in power 'basically robbed the country the expense of all others.

It is customary in the country while the people literally dying of hunger, the dictator and his court deposit their millions of euro in Switzerland, bought a home in Monaco or Paris and goes to the Un to accuse Western countries of causing the ruin of their countries.

Eliminating the debt would only be just another `a way to allow them to continue with impunity to enrich themselves with impunity, destroying their country and millions of persone.Il debt should be abolished, and these countries should receive grants, only under condizione.In other words, the funding should be approved only if they are used to carry out works and structures for the population, otherwise end up in the accounts at the bank `s ruling elite.

At the same time, as do the various Christian organizations, including Catholic, you can help impress it `s looking for respect for the individual, Women, children, imparting Christian values. In this work of real help to these countries had very distinct President Bush, not surprisingly very popular in West Africa '. Certainly encouraging, as did Obama `s abortion as a means of birth control should be exactly the opposite direction.