Monday, October 26, 2009

Causes Of Sudden Receding Gums

Piero, the `hero who sacrifices everything for love and democracy


In an Orwellian eteordiretta Italy by the great satrap TV Silvio Berlusconi, in which the heroes are the protagonists X factor, the Isle of Fame, of Big Brother.
In an Italy where the newspapers of the opposition are desperate `,` through surveys of author, to liberate people's minds darkened by the satrap of television propaganda. In a `
Italy where people are slaves of vulgar instincts racist and sexist, and most do not understand the saving action of` `class hatred, is a new hero appeared: Piero Marazzo.
Marazzo As a true hero who sacrificed his family, his personal interests, his career just to give love to the trans, at the margins of society that has made me feel loved and full of dignity.
He did not like the mafia satrap who has treated both women and objects.
course being the left, he would have developed the body and soul of any prostitutes or clothes, would have made people feel, not objects.
But that is able to do so everyone belongs to the left, but not Marazzo and she is the average man of the Left, he is a hero.
Thus I decided to give a strong signal, has chosen the trans to make it clear how absurd and outdated separation between man and woman, how absurd to claim that the woman is created for man and vice versa.
The separation of gender, it's just a prison in which the conventions of bigots, want to hold free and democratic souls. From
Marazzo clear that this story is a hero "Social and political.
Piero could resign, but in this way would force the taxpayers of Lazio, in a time of crisis, to pay for new elections that the satrap of the troops would win. Being a hero
aware Marazzo decided to avert the danger, although she knew that this would have caused the attacks of assassins assassins of the dictator.
So she is the democratic hero decided to save his beloved region from the risk of fascism, the team ensuring free and democratic civil to organize its forces to the battle of March.

neoconservative

Monday, October 12, 2009

Marithe Et Francois Girbaud Spaccio Aziendale

The Messiah of the anti-American



Two weeks ago, Obama presented himself `in Copenhagen in order to win in the race for Chicago` s award the Olympic Games 2016.Obama, on his arrival, all the other `dark Heads of state and leaders of the IOC. All photographers, TV and print journalists, ordinary people focused their attention on the man of hope with a personal welcome and a warmth that is usually reserved for heroes. The moment is and however, is decided to whom to assign the Olympics', and `Chicago` s American was immediately eliminated.
`last Friday, a surprise, the Norwegian committee that awards the Nobel Prize Peace has given recognition to Obama.
These two episodes are, from my point of view, the `symbol of the Obama presidency, a president welcomed everywhere by crowds, incensed by the media, and local politicians.
difference than the other, "welcome" he received Bush jr is very strong, and with him the `America looks really loved everywhere.
C `and` only one problem: how to Copenhagen, when it comes to getting something concrete for the `America, for his country, Obama always comes home empty-handed.
He openings, without any conditions, all the dictatorships of the world from Cuba North Korea, from Iran to Venezuela `without getting anything in return except backslapping and promise of future consideration.
He left Czech Republic and Poland all `Russian influence with the aim, apparently, to obtain Russian support against` l `Iran, and Moscow's has basically said, '` good read so that maybe we can help you. "
He has denied the role of `secular America in the world as a beacon of democracy and freedom, invented a` s `and` Islam is that there `d` while incense the Muslim world, has virtually abandoned the `Iraq and got nothing, nothing assolutam institution for `America except the compliments, of course.
Last ingenious proposal of his administration is to negotiate with the Taliban other than presenting them as if Al Queda, anyone who knows a bit of `English or want to use a vocabulary is easily dozens of interviews with Taliban leaders' who proudly claim their admixture with Al Queda.
`Anyone who follows the events of 2001 knows that Al Qaeda was able to organize` l \u200b\u200b`attack in America thanks to the fact that, as has the Clinton's ineptitude, the` Afghanistan had become a free port of Al Queda . In addition, Bush is also known that before declaring war on Afghanistan `asked the Taliban to surrender Osama Bin Laden, of course, getting a flat refusal.
This, as the generals call for troops promise because inability to ensure effective even with the current of his own safety, let alone that of civilians.
This political strategy if it brings concrete results, positive for 'America is perfect, however, filled with `and` multiculturalism, politically correct, of appeasement to dictators, to the applause of the elite `otttenere of left liberals and Communist Europe.
If you add to this a pro-abortion policy (with the funding of NGOs that support the use of `` abortion as a contraceptive in the third world), as well as `an attempt of nationalization of Health inside of a general policy of strengthening the role of the state in American society, it is not surprising that the Nobel Prize is not a thing in the end so is surprising
Indeed, if one considers that It has been a rewarding and jury, whose president was a close collaborator of the KGB and the majority of the members are social democrats, that is, all people who have always despised if not hated, the `America and its way of life, the Nobel is almost predictable.
`The same result, however, probably would have been obtained if instead of KGB spies and there were old Communist fascists and reactionary Catholics, also they` always hostile 'to America.
neoconservative

Monday, October 5, 2009

Monica_roccaforte_bio

Can the Democratic Party survive without Berlusconi?




Saturday afternoon is a demonstration held in Rome for the freedom of the press in Italy , according to the `opposition, would be in grave danger. Subsequently, there is `was the usual dance of figures on the real presence at the event, which, however, was successful.
Consequently, it can be considered a success that can serve to cement at the moment an opposition divided and lacks a clear plan and clear and able to find consensus and homogeneity in the name of `only` antiberlusconismo.
The PD would be the renewal of the Italian party, the real break with the world of the Cold War and the First Republic. A
politic "in which men and then flowed into the history and culture of the Old Left Democrats and the Communist Party, with the aim of creating a modern European left.
In reality, this party modern, European, post-Communist has not so far seen the light.
The reasons can be many but, from my point of view, two are predominant: the lack of a courageous, even painful analysis of its historical past, a Jacobin interpretation of `political struggle. By the end
the Cold War, in all countries of Europe, albeit in different ', the communist parties have come to terms with their history, they have faced and discussed their allegiance to Soviet totalitarianism, their complicity with an oppressive regime and freedom. This
while causing short-term spin-offs and loss of consensus, has allowed many of them to redefine themselves as left-wing parties Post Feed really Communists.
In Italy, the communist left, paradoxically, with the defeat of communism has finally had the possibility of coming to power nationally.
It has been a sufficient "maquillage" dialectical and symbolic, on `long wave of" clean hands ", the Communist left became the "new" party automatically became a modern post Cold War. That
historical conjuncture has meant that the Italian left, not only have carefully avoided to analyze their past, their mistakes and horrors but have done to enhance its historical path.
In this way, however, `the various post-communist parties, have never had a real credibility especially since they have decided to stand up to censors of vice and protectors of the public Virtue.
Goals, according to their offense, only through the policy of disposing of the opponent responsible for the degeneration of social and civil Berlusconi. The recent behavior of
Prime Minister are objectively quite questionable, Because, his demonization is a process that began back in 1994 left.
since the mid-nineties the Left, especially the so-called moderate, instead of criticizing the premier choices for the wrong policies he promoted a campaign of criticism on any a priori attitude and policy promoted by Berlusconi. This is
antiberlusconismo been carried out with such vehemence and urgency, especially by intellectuals, which is become a sort of "passport" without which there is no right to enter the left.
This attitude, however `resulted, for opposite reasons, serious consequences for the same accident.
fact, moralistic and censorious campaign did not get support among the moderates, but at the same time, he "fondamentalizzato" the party's electoral base.
The moderates did not like a political vision focused on the demonization of the opponent and at the same time, they considered not credible political actors who act as moral censors, never having a renegade political support and economic and political dependence on the a totalitarian power responsible for millions of deaths.
The leftists, however, have strongly shared the interpretation of their leaders and their newspapers, that `s` widespread illegality, immorality `l`, the social cohesion are not strangers to their share policy, and are exclusively the result of the `existence of Silvio Berlusconi, through his immense power with no Italians in the ability to reason, that is to vote left.
With fifteen years of this policy, the moderate left is to become a victim if stessa.Come veltroniana experience has demonstrated the bankruptcy, in fact, the foundation does not accept even a partial break with the `antiberlusconismo, considered not sufficient but necessary and unavoidable.
Moreover, just when with Veltroni tried timidly to abandon the `antiberlusconismo, the Democratic Party is allied with Di Pietro, new Saint Just, who was antiberlusconismo` s the essence of his program. The consequence of this
strategy is contradictory been soundly defeated in the general election, the people left who awarded the only one with carrying out no ifs and buts `s antiberlusconismo. Thus I
, the PD is not left to run for cover, trying to reclaim the role of party inquisitor, purifying the vices of the Italians.
Hopefully in the coming years intellectuals and left-wing politicians understand that the axiom `intelligent people as free and honest vote that inevitably left and only for them who still believe in the moral and intellectual superiority of the left.
We hope that they understand that without having come to terms with their past, and without having a consistent behavior, are not reliable as censors vice, are simply hypocrites.
We hope that this will happen for the good of this country, in need of a modern secular left and the West.



neoconservative

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Moncler Jackets Stores In The U.s

Odifreddi the biological superiority of the left and on Holocaust revisionism and Stalinism



few days ago, Professor Odifreddi refused the award "Giuseppe Peano" for the best book science.

Odifreddi justified suorifiuto proudly claiming that refuses to be recorded in the register with a person like George extremist Zionist Israel and with the government and information site online correct information
The newspapers of the left, despite devote themselves, without interruption, editorials and articles is the risk that our society is turning into a society intolerant against anyone who does not think like us, is the risk that the government wants to impose the single thought, have completely ignored the issue.
heard the news on the sheet, I went on the site Odifreddi and I found some interesting interpretations of the professor. I discovered that, ignorant and stupid, (for Christian Odifreddi means idiot), I thought the math on a school and a science, and instead she is the only religion can.
In reality, however, is, that which really struck me is the historical revisionism that implements Odifreddi towards Nazism and Stalinism dellla as well as she is the questionable use of police and philosophical theories to demonstrate the superiority `structural and moral of communism over capitalism.

About democracy and dictatorship (from capitalism and communism, which side is `science) writes:

" There are of course different ways of electing a parliament, of which more widespread is the majority choice among different alternative.Nel 1785 the Marquis de Condorcet who discovered that this system is paradoxical {...] In 1951 Kenneth Arrow proved that there is a theorem oltanto a voting system which satisfies the following properties:
individual freedom (the voters can vote for candidates they prefer);
dependency rate (the result of voting is determined only by the votes cast):
`monotonicity (if a candidate wins by taking a number of votes, if they keep winning to take more).
As that is may be surprising, this system is the only dictatorship. "
Odifreddi dissertation arguing that ending the use As `this theorem (but not the theory, theorem) applies to any type of vote, it casts the shadow left on the political system" so-called democrats "

Reading this logical demonstration on the superiority of dictatorship over democracy, may be some doubts about the concept of democracy 'that has the prof.Odifreddi.
doubt that he himself, can diminish through the virtual interview with Hitler's "bloody vegetarian" happens "while sixty years later, the world is organizing a Fourth Reich that goes from the United States to the Mediterranean."


start with Stalin, good father and a victim of the country `s western propaganda machine.

"I do not believe that there are objective reasons, in addition to the defeat? Stalin had won the war, and yet his name has become synonymous with evil.

Millions have not thought that way about Stalin, before and after the war: How many Russians have cried when he died? "I'm afraid you do not know much nor Stalinism, Nazism, nor, apart from what Ammannato Ministries of Propaganda, of his country and what it commands. "

continue with revisionism on `historical holocaust, after all, has not prevented millions of Jews spread throughout the world and has taught to Jews and minorities are to be treated:

" I will deny, however, that the Nazis is guilty of crimes against humanity never before seen.

Ah, yes, and what?

First, the extermination of six million Jews.

not say crap. My model for the solution of the Jewish problem was the way in which the United States had resolved the similar problem in India: a scientific and systematic genocide of the eighteen million natives living in North America. How many Indians remain in the United States today? A few hundred, kept in reserve as the bison. And how many Jews remain however, in the world? Million, and have even been a whole for them, which, among other things, is showing that you have learned our lesson on how to deal with ethnic minorities. "


obviously could not miss the Catholic church source of inspiration for Nazism:

"The Church certainly does not think so!

But if, when Rolf Hochhuth broke the spell with The vicar in 1963, which does not mention the silence of Pius XII against what you call Holocaust! And then, she has certainly not read my Mein Kampf, which I imagine is not easy to find in your library: if he did, remembering that the project for the triumph of Nazism was modeled on the stubborn adherence to the tenets and the fanatical intolerance that have characterized the past the Catholic Church ".

Finally we end with` America, worse than the Nazis during World War II and now an advocate of a Fourth Reich supported by the "new Goebbels as Zeffirelli, and Spielberg Berlusconi ".

" In However, it would suffice to condemn the disregard for human life of innocent civilians who have proved during the war.

This is going to tell the people of Hamburg and Dresden, on which you have lavished the firestorm''that have killed one million. Or those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, three hundred thousand of which were incinerated by atomic bombs: no propaganda can erase the fact that the "bad''Nazis have not built these weapons of mass destruction, while the" good''the United States have not only built, but use!

At this rate, will say that the United States was a country Nazi!

United States could not have followed Nazism, because they preceded and inspired. After all, both wanted one thing: how to sing my SS, Morgen die ganze Welt . Unfortunately the world was almost entirely in the hands of colonial powers, and must be removed by force. The "evil''that we have accused was all here: they want to do what they had done to others. We have failed, but the U.S. is carrying out what was our real project: the global domain ( military, political and economic) on the planet.

And 'This, then, the legacy of Nazism?

He has already said Otto Dietrich zur Linde, the day before his execution, Argentine Borges in an interview, later published under the title Deutsches Requiem : Nazism was an ideology so well thought out that the only way to defeat it was to hug her. We wanted the violence to dominate the world, and our goal has been fully achieved. We have not lived and we did not die in vain. "

I want to end this brief exposition of the thought of returning to his Odifreddi article on communism and capitalism, to highlight the superiority of biological Marxists than other people:

"Roger Sperry's research on brain structure, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1981 showed that the activities of the two hemispheres are different and complementary: the` left hemisphere is responsible for thought abstract and to the activities of communication, writing and ccalcolo; the right is dumb, and responsible to the activities of perception and recognition.

The lateralization of the brain is involved nela thus determining the behavior at the neuronal level, so taleda reflect the political trends: the individuidi left will be more rational and scientific, those on the right artistici.Se more instinctive and the reason is the quality that distinguishes the man animals, you may think that systems of organization of society based on it (Marxism) are more in tune with the biological development instead of those based on instinct '(capitalism).

I just want to conclude , noting that such a person is awarded the medal was all `Order of Merit of the Italian Republic.

neoconservative