few days ago, Professor Odifreddi refused the award "Giuseppe Peano" for the best book science.
Odifreddi justified suorifiuto proudly claiming that refuses to be recorded in the register with a person like George extremist Zionist Israel and with the government and information site online correct information
The newspapers of the left, despite devote themselves, without interruption, editorials and articles is the risk that our society is turning into a society intolerant against anyone who does not think like us, is the risk that the government wants to impose the single thought, have completely ignored the issue.
heard the news on the sheet, I went on the site Odifreddi and I found some interesting interpretations of the professor. I discovered that, ignorant and stupid, (for Christian Odifreddi means idiot), I thought the math on a school and a science, and instead she is the only religion can.
In reality, however, is, that which really struck me is the historical revisionism that implements Odifreddi towards Nazism and Stalinism dellla as well as she is the questionable use of police and philosophical theories to demonstrate the superiority `structural and moral of communism over capitalism.
About democracy and dictatorship (from capitalism and communism, which side is `science) writes:
" There are of course different ways of electing a parliament, of which more widespread is the majority choice among different alternative.Nel 1785 the Marquis de Condorcet who discovered that this system is paradoxical {...] In 1951 Kenneth Arrow proved that there is a theorem oltanto a voting system which satisfies the following properties:
individual freedom (the voters can vote for candidates they prefer);
dependency rate (the result of voting is determined only by the votes cast):
`monotonicity (if a candidate wins by taking a number of votes, if they keep winning to take more).
As that is may be surprising, this system is the only dictatorship. "
Odifreddi dissertation arguing that ending the use As `this theorem (but not the theory, theorem) applies to any type of vote, it casts the shadow left on the political system" so-called democrats "
Reading this logical demonstration on the superiority of dictatorship over democracy, may be some doubts about the concept of democracy 'that has the prof.Odifreddi.
doubt that he himself, can diminish through the virtual interview with Hitler's "bloody vegetarian" happens "while sixty years later, the world is organizing a Fourth Reich that goes from the United States to the Mediterranean."
start with Stalin, good father and a victim of the country `s western propaganda machine.
"I do not believe that there are objective reasons, in addition to the defeat? Stalin had won the war, and yet his name has become synonymous with evil.
Millions have not thought that way about Stalin, before and after the war: How many Russians have cried when he died? "I'm afraid you do not know much nor Stalinism, Nazism, nor, apart from what Ammannato Ministries of Propaganda, of his country and what it commands. "
continue with revisionism on `historical holocaust, after all, has not prevented millions of Jews spread throughout the world and has taught to Jews and minorities are to be treated:
" I will deny, however, that the Nazis is guilty of crimes against humanity never before seen.
Ah, yes, and what?
First, the extermination of six million Jews.
not say crap. My model for the solution of the Jewish problem was the way in which the United States had resolved the similar problem in India: a scientific and systematic genocide of the eighteen million natives living in North America. How many Indians remain in the United States today? A few hundred, kept in reserve as the bison. And how many Jews remain however, in the world? Million, and have even been a whole for them, which, among other things, is showing that you have learned our lesson on how to deal with ethnic minorities. "
obviously could not miss the Catholic church source of inspiration for Nazism:
"The Church certainly does not think so!
But if, when Rolf Hochhuth broke the spell with The vicar in 1963, which does not mention the silence of Pius XII against what you call Holocaust! And then, she has certainly not read my Mein Kampf, which I imagine is not easy to find in your library: if he did, remembering that the project for the triumph of Nazism was modeled on the stubborn adherence to the tenets and the fanatical intolerance that have characterized the past the Catholic Church ".
Finally we end with` America, worse than the Nazis during World War II and now an advocate of a Fourth Reich supported by the "new Goebbels as Zeffirelli, and Spielberg Berlusconi ".
" In However, it would suffice to condemn the disregard for human life of innocent civilians who have proved during the war.
This is going to tell the people of Hamburg and Dresden, on which you have lavished the firestorm''that have killed one million. Or those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, three hundred thousand of which were incinerated by atomic bombs: no propaganda can erase the fact that the "bad''Nazis have not built these weapons of mass destruction, while the" good''the United States have not only built, but use!
At this rate, will say that the United States was a country Nazi!
United States could not have followed Nazism, because they preceded and inspired. After all, both wanted one thing: how to sing my SS, Morgen die ganze Welt . Unfortunately the world was almost entirely in the hands of colonial powers, and must be removed by force. The "evil''that we have accused was all here: they want to do what they had done to others. We have failed, but the U.S. is carrying out what was our real project: the global domain ( military, political and economic) on the planet.
And 'This, then, the legacy of Nazism?
He has already said Otto Dietrich zur Linde, the day before his execution, Argentine Borges in an interview, later published under the title Deutsches Requiem : Nazism was an ideology so well thought out that the only way to defeat it was to hug her. We wanted the violence to dominate the world, and our goal has been fully achieved. We have not lived and we did not die in vain. "
I want to end this brief exposition of the thought of returning to his Odifreddi article on communism and capitalism, to highlight the superiority of biological Marxists than other people:
"Roger Sperry's research on brain structure, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1981 showed that the activities of the two hemispheres are different and complementary: the` left hemisphere is responsible for thought abstract and to the activities of communication, writing and ccalcolo; the right is dumb, and responsible to the activities of perception and recognition.
The lateralization of the brain is involved nela thus determining the behavior at the neuronal level, so taleda reflect the political trends: the individuidi left will be more rational and scientific, those on the right artistici.Se more instinctive and the reason is the quality that distinguishes the man animals, you may think that systems of organization of society based on it (Marxism) are more in tune with the biological development instead of those based on instinct '(capitalism).
I just want to conclude , noting that such a person is awarded the medal was all `Order of Merit of the Italian Republic.
neoconservative
0 comments:
Post a Comment